![]() Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade. Report from a National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute workshop. A simplified and structured teaching tool for the evaluation and management of pulseless electrical activity. Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing. The British Medical Association the RC (UK) and the RC of N. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group TP. UK ambulance service resuscitation management of pulseless electrical activity: a systematic review protocol of text and opinion. Ĭoppola A, Black S, Johnston S, Endacott R. Chapter 4: systematic reviews of text and opinion - JBI Wiki. McArthur A, Klugarova J, Yan H, Florescu S. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 2017. Derivation of a termination of resuscitation clinical decision rule in the UK. House M, Jackson M, Dinning J, McMeekin P. The Association of Ambulance Chief Executives. The ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions. ![]() European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015. Crit Care 2017 21:96.īossaert LL, Perkins GD, Askitopoulou H, et al. Early predictors of poor outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. ![]() Martinell L, Nielsen N, Herlitz J, et al. 2015 Guidelines have now been superseeded by 2021 version. Soar J, Deakin C, Lockey A, Nolan J, Perkins G. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient characteristics: comparing ventricular arrhythmia and pulseless electrical activity. Wolbinski M, Swain AH, Harding SA, Larsen PD. Outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with an initial cardiac rhythm of asystole or pulseless electrical activity in Victoria, Australia. Available at: Īndrew E, Nehme Z, Lijovic M, Bernard S, Smith K. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes Registry epidemiology report, 2018. ![]() There was a consensus to improve patient outcomes using prognostic research. A summary of the evidence in support of the local guidelines found that the early identification and treatment to reverse the cause of PEA was important to patient survival, however, this was acknowledged as complex and challenging to achieve. This review identified variability in the clinical management of PEA the autonomy of paramedics, which patients to transport to hospital and the factors applied to inform resuscitation decisions. Twenty-two documents met the inclusion criteria Twenty-seven conclusions were extracted and analysed to generate 10 categories, forming three synthesised themes: the variability in the clinical management of PEA between ambulance services the early identification of reversible causes and appropriate treatment options to increase survivability and the consensus for further research. Textual data was extracted to form conclusions which were categorised into similar meaning and developed into synthesised findings. A three-step search strategy was applied. The review included locally amended guidelines and cited evidence sources for the management of PEA. The review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review of text and opinion. This review examined the local guidelines of services to identify the local clinical management of PEA, summarise the available evidence and prioritise future research. These guidelines are not fully evidenced, resulting in emergency medical services in the United Kingdom amending guidelines to support paramedics when making resuscitation decisions. Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is managed in accordance with international and national guidelines.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |